On Sunday 23 May 2004 22:08, Dmitry Golubev wrote: > Hello, > > > Is it possible to attach filter rules to HTB classes? > > All my filters belong to some qdisc, so I don't know. > > Quote from LATRC: Also, with HTB, you should attach all filters to the > root! Sorry, my bad, I'm still coming to terms with all the terminology, so probably describe that badly. But going back to my tree: > > > root (100kbps) > > > flatmate1(22kbps) > > > hi prio > > > default > > > lo prio > > > flatmate2-4 (22 kbps each) > > > default (12kbps) Can I set it up (wherever I attach filters) so that unclasified packets will default to flatemate1, and then packets that aren't classified within flatmate fall into the default? (Each flatmate would have their own default) > > My Fair NAT script [1] uses a very similar structure - however, I did > > high/default/low prio stuff you desire not with HTB classes, but with > > a PRIO qdisc attached to the flatmate HTB class. Maybe it's worth a look? Yes, I'd like to see it if I could. Again, trying to get familiar witht things so I'm not sure weather it would be better to try and nest a PRIO or a HTB in the parent HTB. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
