Hello, > Is it possible to attach filter rules to HTB classes? > All my filters belong to some qdisc, so I don't know. Quote from LATRC: Also, with HTB, you should attach all filters to the root! Dmitry On Wednesday 19 May 2004 17:17, Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Wednesday 19 May 2004 14:26 schrieb Chris Jensen: > > Whoops, I was aware of this. I must've sent an old version of the script > > to the list, cause I had fixed that, and that's not the issue anymore. > > If you make an up-to-date version available somewhere, > I'll have a look at it. Don't want to waste my time with > some kind of old version. :-) > > > root (100kbps) > > flatmate1(22kbps) > > hi prio > > default > > lo prio > > flatmate2-4 (22 kbps each) > > default (12kbps) > > My Fair NAT script [1] uses a very similar structure - however, I did > high/default/low prio stuff you desire not with HTB classes, but with > a PRIO qdisc attached to the flatmate HTB class. Maybe it's worth a look? > > > One of the troubles I'm having is setting up defaults. ie. Once a packet > > is filtered into one of the flatmates, how can I send it to the default > > bucket if it doesn't fall into the other two categories. > > Is it possible to attach filter rules to HTB classes? > All my filters belong to some qdisc, so I don't know. > > HTH > Andreas > > [1] Fair NAT: http://www.metamorpher.de/fairnat/ > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
