Re: RV: LATENCY PROBLEMS

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You did not say, what kind of interactive traffic you have,
and is your dsl capable to hold it
800 connections should not be a problem for such cpu,
if you are sure you did not satureted your dsl, in both directions,
and how about http trafiic?

then here is another possibility,  even if tcp can be shaped on forward,
there is still one problem,
if your link as almost full, new tcp connections are not controlable at
start.
all you can do for now is to limit your max rate to 80% of link speed.
this problem usualy happens when someone is using bittorent. that software
creates 20 or more connections for  each file
each tcp connection initiation takes about 3kb of data which cant be shaped.

At first try to limit your link speed to 50% of capacity , then check if it
helps to reduce latency.

I am working on imq driver with tcp prediction, which should fix some
problems.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "GoMi" <gomi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject:  RV: LATENCY PROBLEMS


> Hello there,
>    I'm having lots of problems with my setup here. Let me explain:
>
> I am network administrator for my university dorm. We are about 300 users,
> and we have 2 ADSL connections doing load balancing with 300kbits upstream
> and 2Mbit downstream.
>
> The load balancing is working great, we are doing connection tracking so I
> can mark and hence prioritize interactive traffic and ACKS on the
upstream,
> and with ipp2p I mark p2p traffic allocating it under the non-interactive
> queue.
>
> The problem comes when there is more than 70 users + or -, when
interactive
> traffic stops working at all, or it has a very VERY high latency.
>
> I have a setup based on HTB and WRR.
>
> I have only two possible explanations, or either the CONNMARK module
> introduces a very high latency when the number of entries on
> /pron/net/ip_conntrack rises above lets say 800, or maybe the Ethernets I
> have (cheap Ethernets) are getting saturated with that amount of traffic.
>
> My server is a AMD Duron 800MHz with 768Mb of RAM.
>
> Anyone knowing the marvellous solution? :)
>
> Thank you guys..
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux