Re: Problems balancing two uplink providers

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> IP eth0: 80.27.46.168/26
> IP eth1: 217.12.112.190/30
> IP eth2: 192.168.239.15/24
> 
> Routing rules:
> 
> ip route add 80.27.46.128 dev eth0 src 80.27.46.168 table T1
> ip route add default via 80.27.46.129 table T1
> ip route add 80.27.46.128 dev eth0 src 80.27.46.168
> 
> ip route add 217.12.112.188 dev eth1 src 217.12.112.190 table T2
> ip route add default via 217.12.112.189 table T2
> ip route add 217.12.112.188 dev eth1 src 217.12.112.190

I may not solve your problem, but...  Shouldn't be the address in the
"-net" routes followed by "/26" and "/30", respectively?

Egon
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux