Re: Sequence and Default port

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 22 September 2003 13:25, Raghuveer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have following queries :--
>
> 1. For indicating any default IP we are placing 0/0 as src or dst in the
> tc script, similarly what can I use for default port....?. This is the
> scenario when rules are framed based on ports. For example, For a
> firewall with eth0(WAN), eth1(LAN) and eth2(DMZ), Iam doing CBQ outgoing
> (egress) traffic shaping at eth0 interface for public hosted servers
> located at eth2(DMZ) based on ports(80 for http etc). Now I want to
> frame a rule for remaining traffic (default) allocating remaining
> bandwidth(total rate is 512Kbits, 256 Kbits provided to the hosted
> servers, rest 256KBits is for other traffic). My rules for identifying
> the hosted servers is based entirely on src port. Hence what rule should
> I frame for all other traffic coming from eth1(LAN).
There is no such thing as default port.  But I don't understand why you need 
this.  I think it can be done with the dst/src parameter.

> 2. Is the rule sequence play any role, like if there is any conflict
> between the rules then the last rule will be given preference. what
> happens exactly if there is any conflict...?
The first rule that's a match wil be followed.  Order is based on prio and the 
order they are entered.

Stef

-- 
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux