Hello Stef, I want all these efforts ultimately to convert into a neat, ergonomic web interface for Traffic Shaping - Bandwidth Management for Enterprises which would be in the GPL domain on sourceforge. Though i am with a commercial organisation this is a personal effort and gpl is what the code will be in. Suggestions for the same would be appreciated stef. Trevor On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:29, Stef Coene wrote: > On Sunday 15 June 2003 08:27, Trevor Warren wrote: > > Stef....;) > > > > Hats off to you. I am zapped as to how did you figure out the > > "isolated" class wasn't working???. > I did some filter tests to see if you can split the traffic in different > classes and how you have to do this. At the same time I tried the isolated > parameter. If you have an isolated, not-bounded class, there is no shaping. > As long as the classes are bounded, everything is working like it should be : > http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/cbq/filter.html > > > Anyway Stef, i am glad that you have detected something without my > > telling you. Have changed the same and have restarted the server. Lets > > see. Its night time here in Bombay, hence am playing around with the > > production machine. > > > > Stef, I need to traffic shape for my 1000 odd users on the network. Is > > there a way to do it by having static qdisc's /classes/filters inserted. > It depends on how much control you want to have. If you want to have tied > control, you have to create 1 class (filter) / user. Or you can try the wrr > qdisc (you can find a link on www.docum.org). This qdisc can create 1 class > for each filter/mac-address it sees and punish big downloaders by limiting > the rate. > > > Also, can i do them on the fly by having them login cia a SUID ROOT ph > > page and then get web access and thus adding/deleting these qdisc's > > /classes/filters on the fly???. > Or you use a tc binary with a sticky bit so any user can execute tc and the > execution is done as user root. > > Just wondering, you make all classes bounded. So they can not borrow > bandwidth from each other. But if you do this, why do you create the classes > 1:1 and 1:2 ?? > > And you use 2 filters to put the packets in the end class. You can do this in > 1 step so you need only 1 filter. Just put the packets directly in the end > class. If you are interested, I did some tests with filters and how the > weight parameter influence the sharing between the filters : > http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/cbq/splitting/splitting.html > > Stef -- ( >- GNU/LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\ __ trevor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx __ /~\ | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ | |_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_| \___________________________________/
