On Saturday 26 April 2003 16:47, Nickola Kolev wrote: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:07:52 +0200 > > Matthias Weingart <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > : On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:29:12PM +0300, Nickola Kolev wrote: > : > Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is > : > supposed to? As of my experience, I saw several connections matched > : > right against the filters and put into the correct class, but the > : > bandwidth management wasn't even remotely fair. > : > : Did you use a kernel with > : #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in > : linux/include/net/sched/pkt_sched.h or just the standard kernel? > : > : Matthias > > Nope, > > The place for pkt_sched.h here is linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h. > And there #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_JIFFIES > > Can you tell me what's the difference? I mean, I see that in your > case clock source for packet scheduling is #defined as PSCHED_CPU, > and in mine as PSCHED_JIFFIES, but what's the impact on esfq? About the difference : http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/40.html The impact is increased precision. Stef -- stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
