Re: [LARTC] esfq experience anyone?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:07:52 +0200
Matthias Weingart <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 : On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:29:12PM +0300, Nickola Kolev wrote:
 : 
 : > Did anyone tried it, and more important, did it worked the way it is supposed to?
 : > As of my experience, I saw several connections matched right against the filters
 : > and put into the correct class, but the bandwidth management wasn't even remotely
 : > fair.
 : 
 : Did you use a kernel with
 : #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU in linux/include/net/sched/pkt_sched.h
 : or just the standard kernel?
 : 
 :         Matthias

Nope,

The place for pkt_sched.h here is linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h.
And there #define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE     PSCHED_JIFFIES

Can you tell me what's the difference? I mean, I see that in your
case clock source for packet scheduling is #defined as PSCHED_CPU,
and in mine as PSCHED_JIFFIES, but what's the impact on esfq?

TIA,
Nickola

Attachment: pgp00126.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux