On Wed, 15 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:11:09 +0200 (CEST) > From: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx> > To: Catalin BOIE <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change > > > > :) You can drop & recreate it safely. User will > > > not see it. The change function for SFQ will be > > > probably considered "redundant" by other kernel > > > developers because of it. > > > > But you loose counters! This is bad IMHO. > > That's good point ! So that go ahead and implement it for > SFQ :) But it is already! But in sch_sfq.c at the end (in jump table) is "NULL /* sfq_change */"! There are race problems in sfq_change? I found a patch on the net that puted NULL instead sfq_change... Thanks! --- Catalin(ux) BOIE catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx openh323://dino.rdsbv.ro
