Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > :) You can drop & recreate it safely. User will
> > not see it. The change function for SFQ will be
> > probably considered "redundant" by other kernel
> > developers because of it.
>
> But you loose counters! This is bad IMHO.

That's good point ! So that go ahead and implement it for
SFQ :)



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux