On Thu, 9 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote: > Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST) > From: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx> > To: Catalin BOIE <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change > > Because there is nothing to change once created. For HTB > it might be r2q or debug but there is no real need yet. > devik It's hard to implement it? Thanks! > > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Catalin BOIE wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > Why in kernel in net/sched/sch_sfq.c and in other places (htb) the change > > function is not sfq_change (or htb_change) and is NULL instead? > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > --- > > Catalin(ux) BOIE > > catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > --- Catalin(ux) BOIE catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab
