Should not be. But HTB is in feature freeze. My main goal is to be in kernel asap. Then we can do some changes later. I'd like to keep the code from larger updates now. Do you need it ? And why ? devik On Fri, 10 May 2002, Catalin BOIE wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST) > > From: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx> > > To: Catalin BOIE <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change > > > > Because there is nothing to change once created. For HTB > > it might be r2q or debug but there is no real need yet. > > devik > > It's hard to implement it? > Thanks! > > > > > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Catalin BOIE wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > Why in kernel in net/sched/sch_sfq.c and in other places (htb) the change > > > function is not sfq_change (or htb_change) and is NULL instead? > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > --- > > > Catalin(ux) BOIE > > > catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > > --- > Catalin(ux) BOIE > catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab > > >
