> Should not be. But HTB is in feature freeze. My main > goal is to be in kernel asap. I wish you good luck! HTB deserves to be in the main kernel tree. > Then we can do some changes later. I'd like to keep the > code from larger updates now. OK. > Do you need it ? And why ? Yes, I need it. I need to change on the fly r2q to see how the traffic flow changes. But I don't want to delete the whole tree just to change some parameters on the root class. > devik > > On Fri, 10 May 2002, Catalin BOIE wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST) > > > From: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx> > > > To: Catalin BOIE <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb_change sfq_change > > > > > > Because there is nothing to change once created. For HTB > > > it might be r2q or debug but there is no real need yet. > > > devik > > > > It's hard to implement it? > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Catalin BOIE wrote: > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > Why in kernel in net/sched/sch_sfq.c and in other places (htb) the change > > > > function is not sfq_change (or htb_change) and is NULL instead? > > > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Catalin(ux) BOIE > > > > catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > > > > > --- > > Catalin(ux) BOIE > > catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab > > > > > > > --- Catalin(ux) BOIE catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www2.deuroconsult.ro/~catab
