On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:07:37PM +0800, Adi Nugroho wrote: > Dear all... > > If we are using TBF, we can reduce "buffer" and "limit" to minimize latency. > What should we do in SFQ? You can't really. SFQ has a fixed queue length of 128. > I tried to use SFQ, but the latency goes up to 10.000 to 20.000 milisecond > in case of overloaded. SFQ is no substitute for prioritization, but this is ridiculous. Can you show the output of cbq.init? You can do this by looking into the script and turning the logfile on. I think cbq.init is misconfiguring things. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk the dot in .tk Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available - Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control: http://ds9a.nl/lartc
