-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 29 September 2002 02:50 pm, Ramin Alidousti wrote: > > I have added a static route to the portmaster until I can figure this > > out. > > Yes. For your setup static route is good enough and possibly the easiest. > But just as an exercise, I'd like to know what the problem is. > > Ramin Well, doesn't this just figure. I tried to recreate the problem .... and it no longer exists?? I removed the static routes from the portmaster and rebooted it. I then started routed on the linux box and it is 2 hours now and working perfectly! I have a hunch that I know what the problem was though. There was a problem with the pool on one portmaster, and it was spilling over into the 128/26 network. I corrected the problem and reset all ports so that everyone had to log back on, and nobody was assigned an address from the 128/26 network, but I did not reboot it. It must have been trying to keep possesion of the 128/26 network for its own use??? Thanks much. - -- Regards Joseph Watson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9l9VzABydhMNsDgMRAik5AJ9kfUIQCZslxZ0BqyVQvoDJ8iKruACgrQ9B mBbmniv0KBPZR2csFkxEGqo= =fNmW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
