> ]- Opps i've made a mistake... both have to be able to use bantwidth from
> each other (if the "other" is not used at its full capacity).. then it is
> ok.. in HTB it should be :
> 40% -> rate 40% ceil 100%
> 60% -> rate 60% ceil 100%
AND both connected to a 1 class with 100% rate, 100 ceil.
> |> Then in those two channels I want have more small channels say 30 in
> |> each of them... (cbq and htb if posiible :") 'm I nasty !)
> |
> |No problem with cbq nor with htb.
>
> ]- i meaned if possible u to provide examples in both qdisc :")
I have no examples for that with tcng. But I have "some" docs on
www.docum.org if you are interested.
> |> Next question : Say I have to handle other traffic not only Internet,
> |> then I should make sibling channels to my Internet one to handle this,
> |> right ?
> |
> |Mhh. I don't understand your point.
>
> egress { //100Mbps
> //internet traffic
> htb (rate 256Kbps) { .... };
> // other traffic : say intranet traffic
> htb (rate XXX) { .... }
That's indeed the way to handle this.
> |There is also something wrong with the output generated by tcng. But I
> | dived not deep enough in the tcng docs to know what's going wrong.
>
> ]- i cant figure out yet too... (i'm doing those test on the computer at
> work, but still have no Internet there.. )
Reading tc docs is number one on my to do list :)
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
