Re: [tcng] correct config?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



raptor@unacs.bg wrote:
> Below is my tests and I have some questions regarding them :
> first it seems that classification doesnt happen at all ?! and it is
> clear from the u32 filters 'cause they point to classes 1:1 and 1:2 which
> doesnt exist at all ?

They're dsmark classes and don't need explicit creation. They simply
set skb->tc_index to 1 and 2, respectively.

> Also I can't figure out which filter got used u32 or tc_index but
> 'cause tcism_plot generates only enqueed packed and no dequee-packets.

BTW, if you want to see what exactly is going on, you may want to use

tcsim -v -v -v ... | tcsim_pretty

> They have same priority but u32 is attached at root so they should be
> used, right ?

Yes.

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://icapeople.epfl.ch/almesber/_____________________________________/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux