=?iso-8859-1?Q?John_B=E4ckstrand?= writes: > > This is not very convincing. Do you actually know > how WFQ > > works? If so, please tell us. The doc you sent did > not describe how > > it works but what the effects are, and those are > entirely consistent > > with what SFQ does. > > High bandwidth flows are limited, low bandwidth flows > get lower > > latency. Can you describe some effect that's > different? > > I read a bit on WFQ earlier, Im not grasping it totally > and I dont know every implementation detail, but I > think its basically WRR but taking actual bandwidth > usage into account, and not just packet-counts. Well, > try this: > > http://www.sics.se/~ianm/WFQ/wfq_descrip/node21.html This sounds just like SFQ except for the weights. I have a variant of SFQ that does support weights if that's important. It's easy to add. (The hard part is the code that allows you to configure the weights.) _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
