Paul writes: > Nooooo SFQ is not like WFQ... WRR is the closest thing to cisco's > fair-queue.. > WRR keeps track of the connections using the ip_conntrack .. that's sort of > what > cisco's fair-queue does and it checks the bandwidth streams and gives lower > priority > to the higher streams and larger packets.. it's meant to reduce latency for > traffic > shaping and it does :) > I haven't tried WRR but it looks like the closest thing to it although it > doesn't > take everything in to account as cisco's flow based WFQ does.. This is not very convincing. Do you actually know how WFQ works? If so, please tell us. The doc you sent did not describe how it works but what the effects are, and those are entirely consistent with what SFQ does. High bandwidth flows are limited, low bandwidth flows get lower latency. Can you describe some effect that's different? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
