Re: RE: Anything out there that is similar to Cisco's WFQ?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This is not very convincing.  Do you actually know
how WFQ
> works?  If so, please tell us.  The doc you sent did
not describe how
> it works but what the effects are, and those are
entirely consistent
> with what SFQ does.
> High bandwidth flows are limited, low bandwidth flows
get lower
> latency.  Can you describe some effect that's
different?

I read a bit on WFQ earlier, Im not grasping it totally
and I dont know every implementation detail, but I
think its basically WRR but taking actual bandwidth
usage into account, and not just packet-counts. Well,
try this:

http://www.sics.se/~ianm/WFQ/wfq_descrip/node21.html

Im sure you all can get more out of it than me, a total
newbie to queueing theory and QoS.

---
John Bäckstrand


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux