Don Cohen wrote: > > From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@foonet.net> > > Any help would be greatly appreciated :) This is much better than SFQ :> > >Sounds like SFQ to me. Can you tell us what the differences are? > > PRIO'd SFQ. If you had classful PRIO with SFQ on each band, you'd probably have a similar effect to what's been described; just a guess though. It seems the desire is to 'ignore' low-priority bands if high-priority bands have traffic, and to balance between those sessions. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
