On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Jason A. Pattie wrote: > Arthur van Leeuwen wrote: > > >On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Martin Ferrari - Decidir IT wrote: > > > >Yes, Julian's patches do have an influence on multipath routing. They make > >it quite a bit nicer to use in the case of interfaces going down and coming > >back up again, which can and does happen. They also make multipath routing > >and masquerading play even nicer with each other, although I haven't seen > >problems on stock kernels with that. May very well be that the tests I've > >done have been on networks with highly active but not highly demanding i > >users, thereby making sure the route cache stays up to date enough... > >don't really know. > > > >Doei, Arthur. > > > The only problem that I have had with Julian's patches is interoperation > with FreeS/WAN. I am still not able to make that work, although I > haven't worked on it in awhile. The last I remember is that with the > patches applied, the moment FreeS/WAN starts, all network traffic goes > out the ipsec0 interface instead of continuing to be routed via eth0 (or > whichever interface). This happens without a tunnel brought up. And > for some reason, I was not able to assign a metric to the route using > either the 'route' command or 'ip route'. Sorry, can't help you there. Never played with that particular setup... Doei, Arthur. -- /\ / | arthurvl@sci.kun.nl | Work like you don't need the money /__\ / | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never been hurt / \/__ | you can dare to be yourself | Dance like there's nobody watching