is djbdns powerful enough to handle more than 500 domains ? many people
told me that djbdns is more secure than Bind, is it true ? I've installed
djbdns on my development server but don't have courage to install it on my
production server, my consideration is the stability, reliability and
security...
regards,
Jeffery Samuel
------------------------
"Don't reinvent the wheel. Inherit the wheel." - unknown
"Michael T.
Babcock" To: LARTC List <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
<mbabcock@fibresp cc:
eed.net> Subject: Re: [LARTC] DNS (bind vs dnsmasq for
Sent by: small dsl network)
lartc-admin@mailm
an.ds9a.nl
03/22/2002 08:33
PM
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 05:02:30PM -0600, Bill Williamson wrote:
> I'm setting up a router/firewall/etc to replace my current hardware dsl
> router, and installed bind, but this looks much nicer and usable (for
> something small like my setup).
I recommend you seriously consider using djbdns from
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html.
If you need help setting it up, E-mail me -- its pretty easy and for a
small setup, you'll end up editing one line per DNS entry in a text file.
> I'll have 5 computers behind my firewall all the time, and up to 10-15
once
> every other month or so for lan parties.
>
> I've got htb/ingress/etc all happy now, just need to decide on the extras
:)
--
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc)
http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
