> Perhaps i'm supposed to use this complicated route classifier of tc? Eg= =2E > have all packets assigned a realm thru ip route, then use tc to catch t= hese > packets? This is more complicated, and I don't wish to mess with my rou= ting > (i'm using "route", not "ip route", are these even compatible?). Ideall= y > i'd like to be able to simply grab the MARKed packets with tc, let me k= now > if this is possible. > > One additional question from my previous email that didn't get answered= , > that i'd like to know about: after adding the SFQ classes to the leafs = of > the HTB (see first post with the script in it), am I supposed to be > attaching the filters to the 10: handles of the SFQs, or stay the way i= t > is, using the HTB children eg. 1:10 ? If a packet is outted in a class with a filter, the packet is also queued= in=20 the qdisc that belongs to that class. This is normally a FIFO qdisc. Bu= t=20 you can replace it with a SFQ qdisc. So you don't need extra filter to p= ut=20 the traffic in the SFQ qdisc. All packets of the class will also enter t= he=20 qdisc. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org More QOS info : http://www.docum.org/ Title : "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
