[LARTC] Proposal for reasonably secure GRE tunneling

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That would work, and I think I could set up IPSEC with Free S/WAN,
but PPTP is just so much simpler.  And those 9x/ME PCs will be out
there for a long time to come.

- Greg



-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:daniel-wittenberg@starken.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:17 PM
To: Greg Scott
Cc: LARTC
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Proposal for reasonably secure GRE tunneling


Why not use encryption keys instead?  Because if you substitute crypto
key for password, then you have an IPSec tunnel. Besides, MS is moving
away from PPTP.  Take a look at 2k and XP, they have IPSec tunneling, so
that seems to be the right direction to go.

Dan

On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 06:23, Greg Scott wrote:

> After tossing and turning half the night, this idea came into my head:
> 
> It's really neat that we can set up GRE tunnels between Linux servers.
> Way cool, and thanks!  But lack of any kind of security is a problem.
> 
> What if we had a simple way to secure those GRE packets, or at least
> some means for the two VPN servers to authenticate each other?  
> 
> So this idea popped into my head that seems straightforward to implement.
> What if the system admin created accounts in both VPN servers, call them
> lanagre and lanbgre.  It would be up to the system admin to put in strong
> passwords in those accounts.  Both sides would each have both accounts,
> and it would be up to the system admins on both sides to make sure the
> passwords matched.
> 
> So then, when LAN A wants to connect to LAN B, the LAN A VPN server 
> would look up LAN B's password in LAN A's /etc/shadow file, put together
> a key based on that hash, and then use that key to encrypt traffic going
> across.  Similarly for LAN B.  Since both sides have both accounts, nobody
> needs to send passwords across the Internet.
> 
> If we had this in place, then Linux could do everything that Microsoft
PPTP
> does, but Linux wouldn't make the same implementation mistakes
> Microsoft made.  
> 
> How tough would this be to do?  Does the idea make sense?
> 
> - Greg Scott
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux