hi all At last i got sucess !.. but am confused y it didnt work earlier..the difference today was that i reinstalled RH7.2 & complied kernel 2.4.16(not 17).. rest was same..... & the bandwidth too is under control!.. is it normal for to get more than said bandwidth--i mean i restricted a network with 8Kbit(with same script as below) but still was able to get a download(ftp) of 17Kbit(as shown in iptraf) a very spl. thanx 2 Stef and 2 all of u for ur time with my problem arindam haldar -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] iptables mark & iproute Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:13:09 +0530 From: Arindam <ahiam@yahoo.com> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl CC: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> hi..i posted this message sometime back.. can pls someone help me with it.. i basically want traffic to be restricted for all server outside my network ie. 4e.g 64kbps for internet but 512kbps for my lan servers(web/smtp).. i though of doing this(as the script will tell u)--mark packets with iproute & restrict the traffic with iprote2(lan-web or smtp)..if no mark then pass thru the default bandwidth for the ip group !! the linux box is always handling 1Mb+ traffic from eth0(net interface).. awaiting some guidance for u Gurus there... arindam haldar Message: 6 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 11:24:30 +0530 From: Arindam Haldar <ahiam@yahoo.com> To: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Subject: Re: [LARTC] iptables mark & iproute related ! hi, Stef Coene wrote: > On Thursday 03 January 2002 15:17, Arindam Haldar wrote: >>hi >>i did those test & as i said in my last mail there is trafic passing thru >>ir bytes counter r increasing but the tc command doesnt show any >>restircition. seem like marked pkts r not going thru the iproute >> > Sorry, you wrote to encrypted for me to understand everything [;-)] > If I understand correctly, everything works if you use CBQ & SFQ, but the fw > filter is not working like it should be ? YES !!! .. UR ABSOLUTELY RIGHT !!!! [:-)] > >>any suggestions ?? >> > Can you post the scripts you are using so I can try them myself ? > > Stef > THIS IS MY TRUNCATED SCRIPT(MARK RELATED) ! iptables -A INPUT -i eth4 -s 192.168.1.1 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -o eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -j ACCEPT iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth4 -p 6 --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth4 -s 192.168.1.1 -d a.b.c.d -j MARK --set-mark 55 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth4 -s 192.168.1.1 -d ! a.b.c.d -j MARK --set-mark 51 iptables -A POSTROUTING -t mangle -o eth0 -s 192.168.1.1 -j MASQUERADE iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -d 192.168.1.1 -s a.b.c.d -j MARK --set-mark 56 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 192.168.1.1 -s ! a.b.c.d -j MARK --set-mark 52 ###--32kbps for x-LAN tc class add dev eth4 parent 5:1 classid 5:191 est 2sec 10sec cbq bandwidth 512Kbit rate 32Kbit allot 5\1514 weight 3.2Kbit prio 2 maxbrust 5 avpkt 1500 bounded tc qdisc add dev eth4 parent 5:191 sfq perturb 10 tc filter add dev eth4 parent 5:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 51 fw flowid 5:191 tc filter add dev eth4 parent 5:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 52 fw flowid 5:191 ###--128 for LAN tc class add dev eth4 parent 5:1 classid 5:192 est 2sec 10sec cbq bandwidth 512Kbit rate 128Kbit allot 5\1514 weight 3.2Kbit prio 2 maxbrust 5 avpkt 1500 bounded tc qdisc add dev eth4 parent 5:192 sfq perturb 10 tc filter add dev eth4 parent 5:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 55 fw flowid 5:192 tc filter add dev eth4 parent 5:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 56 fw flowid 5:192 similar for eth0 too !! thanx in anticipation arindam haldar
