On 08/29/2012 11:49 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 29 August 2012 09:47, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2012-08-28 23:26, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Since this is arch-specific we should probably give the >>> resulting device a more specific name than "pci-assign", >>> which implies that it is (a) ok for any PCI system and >>> (b) not something that will be obsolete in the foreseen >>> future. >> >> The name has to be like this for libvirt compatibility. I can provide it >> as alias, though, calling the device "kvm-pci-assign" by default. Better? > > ...is it likely to ever work for non-x86 PCI devices? It used to work for ia64 before it died. So it's not architecture specific by design. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
