On 2012-08-28 23:26, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 August 2012 13:15, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2012-08-27 14:07, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Am I correct to understand we compile this only for i386 / x86_64? >> >> This is correct. > > Did we ever make a decision about whether architecture specific > KVM devices should all live in hw/kvm/ or in some directory > with the arch name in it? I guess they're all in hw/kvm/ at > the moment so they should stay there unless there's a pressing > reason to move them around... Yep, that would be the plan. As long as there are x86 platform devices under hw/kvm, I see no point putting this one elsewhere. It's trivially moved when time has come. > > Since this is arch-specific we should probably give the > resulting device a more specific name than "pci-assign", > which implies that it is (a) ok for any PCI system and > (b) not something that will be obsolete in the foreseen > future. The name has to be like this for libvirt compatibility. I can provide it as alias, though, calling the device "kvm-pci-assign" by default. Better? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
