On 29 August 2012 09:47, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2012-08-28 23:26, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Since this is arch-specific we should probably give the >> resulting device a more specific name than "pci-assign", >> which implies that it is (a) ok for any PCI system and >> (b) not something that will be obsolete in the foreseen >> future. > > The name has to be like this for libvirt compatibility. I can provide it > as alias, though, calling the device "kvm-pci-assign" by default. Better? ...is it likely to ever work for non-x86 PCI devices? -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html