On 08/23/2012 11:51 AM, Hao, Xudong wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kvm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Avi Kivity >> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 6:43 PM >> To: Roedel, Joerg >> Cc: Hao, Xudong; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Xiantao >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/fpu: Enable fully eager restore kvm FPU >> >> On 08/20/2012 01:14 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:08:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> >> On 08/20/2012 12:24 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote: >> > >> >> So it was broken all along? Yikes. >> > >> > There is no LWP support in the kernel and thus KVM can't expose it to >> > guests. So for now nothing should be broken, no? >> >> Oh, we mask out xcr0 bits not supported by the host. >> >> So it's broken in another way: it isn't exposed. Pity, it's such a nice >> feature. >> > > Hi, Avi/Joerg > > What's the decision for it? I don't understand LWP, so how about this patch? It's fine (Joerg can send the LWP change), but there was a truncation issue that needs fixing, no? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
