On 2012-01-24 12:34, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/24/2012 10:57 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> That says that it's unneeded on (some?) IBM Power systems. We need it >>> on Freescale chips. I submitted an upstream-QEMU patch to do this flush >>> (referenced in that thread, still not applied) because I was seeing >>> cache problems when loading images. >> >> Then you probably want to limit your patch's effect to that particular >> set of chips and repost it to qemu-devel. In any case, it's not a >> qemu-kvm topic as we are x86-only for quite a while. >> > > IIRC introduced for ia64. But isn't the correct action adding it to > qemu.git instead of removing it completely? Adding something to qemu.git, yes, keeping it here without knowing the final code, no. This is just another unused variation from upstream. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
