On 2012-01-24 01:26, Scott Wood wrote: > On 01/19/2012 12:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-01-19 18:54, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> This is at best a PPC topi but according to [1] even there unneeded. In >>>> any case, remove this diff to upstream, it should be handled there if >>>> actually needed. >>> >>> [1] ? >>> >> >> Oops. >> >> --------8<--------- >> >> This is at best a PPC topi but according to [1] even there unneeded. In >> any case, remove this diff to upstream, it should be handled there if >> actually needed. >> >> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/119022/focus=119086 > > That says that it's unneeded on (some?) IBM Power systems. We need it > on Freescale chips. I submitted an upstream-QEMU patch to do this flush > (referenced in that thread, still not applied) because I was seeing > cache problems when loading images. Then you probably want to limit your patch's effect to that particular set of chips and repost it to qemu-devel. In any case, it's not a qemu-kvm topic as we are x86-only for quite a while. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
