On 2012-01-10 20:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> But IMO this >>> shows it is a more generic interface. >> >> I'm worried about adding something new that will soon become obsolete >> again. That's wasted effort IMHO unless we say today that there will be >> no in-kernel MSI-X support. >> >> Jan > > Yes. But as we are adding a new interface maybe it's better to add a > more generic one? I don't insist as I don't have a specific proposal, > just something to consider. I could imagine defining an extensible IRQ masking interface, e.g. with flags that select the type, but only implementing it for INTx for now. Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
