On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:40:59PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-01-10 20:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> But IMO this > >>> shows it is a more generic interface. > >> > >> I'm worried about adding something new that will soon become obsolete > >> again. That's wasted effort IMHO unless we say today that there will be > >> no in-kernel MSI-X support. > >> > >> Jan > > > > Yes. But as we are adding a new interface maybe it's better to add a > > more generic one? I don't insist as I don't have a specific proposal, > > just something to consider. > > I could imagine defining an extensible IRQ masking interface, e.g. with > flags that select the type, but only implementing it for INTx for now. > > Jan > I guess if we pass in the IRQ# the type can be inferred and does not need to be passed in. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
