On 01/04/2012 04:54 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/04/2012 11:25 AM, Carsten Otte wrote: > > Hi Avi, > > > > after some more discussion about how to do storage keys proper, I could > > not come up with a sane and safe way of doing SSKE without either > > over or underindicating the change bit in corner cases (leads to > > corrupted guest memory or host kernel panic). > > The storage key operations are completely seperate from the rest of > > the ucontrol series: > > - ucontrol VMs can operate without them (handled by hardware) > > - regular VMs can make use of them too (needed for live migration) > > > > This respin only contains the non-controversial patches. I would > > kindly like to ask for inclusion, I will retry on storage keys as > > soon as I've got a solution. > > Everything looks good to me. I'll wait for a bit for more reviews (and > possibly Reviewed-by:s), and to see if my suggestion re patch 7 is any good. > btw, when I say "I'll wait a bit" I really mean "I'll forget everything about it", so feel free to remind me in a few days. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
