Re: [patch 00/11] Ucontrol patchset respin without storage keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2012 11:25 AM, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> after some more discussion about how to do storage keys proper, I could
> not come up with a sane and safe way of doing SSKE without either
> over or underindicating the change bit in corner cases (leads to
> corrupted guest memory or host kernel panic).
> The storage key operations are completely seperate from the rest of
> the ucontrol series:
> - ucontrol VMs can operate without them (handled by hardware)
> - regular VMs can make use of them too (needed for live migration)
>
> This respin only contains the non-controversial patches. I would
> kindly like to ask for inclusion, I will retry on storage keys as
> soon as I've got a solution.

Everything looks good to me.  I'll wait for a bit for more reviews (and
possibly Reviewed-by:s), and to see if my suggestion re patch 7 is any good.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux