Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: introduce kvm_for_each_memslot macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2011/11/21 17:34), Avi Kivity wrote:
Do you have any preference for the arguments ordering?

I think placing the target one, memslot in this case, first is
conventional in
the kernel code, except when we want to place "kvm" or something like
that.

But in kvm code, there seems to be some difference.

You mean for the macro?  Yes, making memslot the first argument is a
good idea.  Any difference in kvm code is not intentional.


Yes.

Xiao, please change the order if you have no problem.

Thanks,
	Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux