On 2011-11-01 16:30, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:39:49AM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> So SVM does not guarantee that an intercept during a task-switch can be >>> restarted. >> >> Not a bug but still a deficit as it makes hardware-assisted task >> switching practically useless, no? > > Not entirely. For hypervisors that can guarantee that there will be no > intercept (NPT pre-mapped, no exceptions intercepted) it will still > work. Yes, but that only covers the niche of simple static ones (partitioning hypervisors). Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
