On 25.07.2011, at 15:09, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:51 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> And if you need to share code with perf, then that just proves the >> point that perf doesn't belong inside the kernel tree either. > > You seem to want to prove something here but our reasoning is based on > experience and practicalities - not some theoretical idea what should > and what shouldn't be in the Linux kernel tree. I really don't think > that perf would have turned out to be as useful as it is if it was > developed out-of-the-tree. IIUC that was mainly because the interface is very very closely coupled with kernel code. > That's also why we think tools/kvm is such a good idea. I like pears, so I like apples too? Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
