On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:47 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/25/2011 03:45 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Graf<agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> And don't get this the wrong way either, I'm not hostile against other > > >> operating systems, but I simply am not interested enough in them to > > >> spend my time improving them. > > > > > > Then kvm-tool is about as useful as Mac-on-Linux. Why don't we have MoL user land in the kernel? I even added support for KVM to it about a year ago. So all I need to do is change it to the kernel coding style, add some dependencies on kernel headers and I'm good for a pull request? > > > > Oh, I dunno - have you tried that? If you're interested in sending a > > patch against tools/kvm that adds KVM-based support to Mac, I'm happy > > to review it and consider for inclusion. ;-) > > The patch will be a lot bigger than tools/kvm itself. > But it would be as a single patch series which includes kvm and tools/kvm :) -- Sasha. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
