On 25.07.2011, at 14:51, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:47 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 07/25/2011 03:45 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Graf<agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> And don't get this the wrong way either, I'm not hostile against other >>>>> operating systems, but I simply am not interested enough in them to >>>>> spend my time improving them. >>>> >>>> Then kvm-tool is about as useful as Mac-on-Linux. Why don't we have MoL user land in the kernel? I even added support for KVM to it about a year ago. So all I need to do is change it to the kernel coding style, add some dependencies on kernel headers and I'm good for a pull request? >>> >>> Oh, I dunno - have you tried that? If you're interested in sending a >>> patch against tools/kvm that adds KVM-based support to Mac, I'm happy >>> to review it and consider for inclusion. ;-) >> >> The patch will be a lot bigger than tools/kvm itself. >> > > But it would be as a single patch series which includes kvm and > tools/kvm :) Not sure I get what you mean here. We already have KVM support for Macs ;). And pSeries. And the PS3. It even works on the Wii. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
