Re: [PATCH 5/5] ioeventfd: Introduce KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_SOCKET

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/14/2011 11:14 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>  I'm talking about the real world.  Is any of this something that needs
>  optimization?

Yes. See Sasha's other email. We should have mentioned that in the changelog.

It's completely unrealistic. Sash and you are the only two people in the universe logging into the guest via a serial console and running benchmarks.

>  1024 vcpus logging in via the serial console at 10Gbps.  Get real.

[...]

Huh, why are you bringing something like that up?

Because it's another example of an unrealistic approach on your part. No real user is interested in 1024 vcpus, and no real user is interested in optimized serial console. It's good that you are bringing up new ideas and new code, but adding code just for its own sake is not a good thing.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux