On 07/12/2011 02:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > I don't insist on a new type of exit, just pointing out the problem. I agree with you, I don't have a better solution either. I don't feel it's worth it adding so much code for read support to properly work. Can we do this patch series without socket read support at the moment?
No. As I said before, I don't want a fragmented ABI. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
