On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 02:11:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-06-28 14:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> No longer used. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> I think it's actually handy to build on old systems which have > >>> a recent enough kernel but not the header. > >>> Does it hurt much to keep it around? > >> > >> Unless I missed something, it's not part of any include search path. So > >> how can it help? > >> > > > > We used to have compat last on search path. Is that no longer so? > > I did a grep for "compat" and found nothing suspicious in configure or > some makefile. So this file looked like dead bits to me. > > Jan > kvm_cflags="$kvm_cflags -idirafter $source_path/compat" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
