On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> No longer used. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I think it's actually handy to build on old systems which have > > a recent enough kernel but not the header. > > Does it hurt much to keep it around? > > Unless I missed something, it's not part of any include search path. So > how can it help? > We used to have compat last on search path. Is that no longer so? I can try and dig up an old host that has this configuration. > But if you think such a header is useful, then get it upstream. > > Jan It's not upstream because we didn't used to have system headers upstream. Now that we do it makes sense I think ... -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
