On 2011-06-28 14:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-06-28 13:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> No longer used. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> I think it's actually handy to build on old systems which have >>> a recent enough kernel but not the header. >>> Does it hurt much to keep it around? >> >> Unless I missed something, it's not part of any include search path. So >> how can it help? >> > > We used to have compat last on search path. Is that no longer so? I did a grep for "compat" and found nothing suspicious in configure or some makefile. So this file looked like dead bits to me. Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
