Re: [PATCH 0/30] nVMX: Nested VMX, v9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 16, 2011, Gleb Natapov wrote about "Re: [PATCH 0/30] nVMX: Nested VMX, v9":
> > Hi, I can quite easily save this state in a different place which is saved -
> > The easiest will just be to use vmcs12, which has place for exactly the fields
> > we want to save (and they are rewritten anyway when we exit to L1).
> > 
> This will not address the problem that the state will not be visible to
> generic logic in x86.c.

Maybe I misunderstood your intention, but given that vmcs12 is in guest
memory, which is migrated as well, isn't that enough (for the live migration
issue)?


-- 
Nadav Har'El                        |       Monday, May 16 2011, 12 Iyyar 5771
nyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx             |-----------------------------------------
Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |The trouble with political jokes is they
http://nadav.harel.org.il           |get elected.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux