On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:18:25PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Okay, truly excellent. The code is now a lot more readable, and I'm > almost beginning to understand it. The code comments are also very > good, I wish we had the same quality comments in the rest of kvm. > We can probably merge the next iteration if there aren't significant > comments from others. > I still feel that interrupt injection path should be reworked to be SVM like before merging the code. > The only worrying thing is the issue you raise in patch 8. Is there > a simple fix you can push that addresses correctness? > > -- > I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this > signature is too narrow to contain. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
