On 04/08/2011 10:59 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:14:06 -0500
Anthony Liguori<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If someone was going to seriously go about doing something like this, a
better approach would be to start with QEMU and remove anything non-x86
and all of the UI/command line/management bits and start there.
There's nothing more I'd like to see than a viable alternative to QEMU
but ignoring any of the architectural mistakes in QEMU and repeating
them in a new project isn't going to get there.
Supporting only a single architecture sounds like a significant
architectural mistake... only x86 deserves clean code?
No, you just have to start somewhere. Since x86 is probably the
ugliest, I think it's the best place to start.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
