On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:14:06 -0500 Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If someone was going to seriously go about doing something like this, a > better approach would be to start with QEMU and remove anything non-x86 > and all of the UI/command line/management bits and start there. > > There's nothing more I'd like to see than a viable alternative to QEMU > but ignoring any of the architectural mistakes in QEMU and repeating > them in a new project isn't going to get there. Supporting only a single architecture sounds like a significant architectural mistake... only x86 deserves clean code? -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
